Carve-Out Execution: Where do you spend most time?

Optimising for the End State, Not Just Day 1

M&ACARVE-OUTSEXECUTIONVALUE CREATION

10/16/20261 min read

In my typical carve-out engagements, much of my effort goes into constructing the future state of the carved-out business.

While not an exact science, directionally, I’d say 70% of the effort goes into End-State design and implementation, and 30% into Day 1 and TSA readiness. This applies for both PE-backed and corporate Carve-Outs.

The reason is simple -

Value is truly generated much beyond TSA Exit -

When the business reaches an optimised End State. This is achieved by finding the right balance of standalone and integrated elements with a sustainable cost base.

How to approach this?

Define where the business needs to land.

Price in the required cost base, regulatory requirements and value creation levers. Then work backwards to determine what needs to happen by Day 1 and through the TSA period.


And, this is where the fun bit kicks in.

The key integration principles that shape the End State are often not fully defined by the Buyer upfront.

Think -
- Which legal entity should be the “home” for the incoming business?
- How integrated should Finance, Billing, ERP or M365 be?
- What should remain fully standalone?

So, as a Carve-Out operator, much of our early work is therefore hypothesis- and judgement-led.

Our key role is to turn those large pool of unknowns and assumptions into clear design choices - and ultimately into an executable End State.

Now, all this doesn’t make Day 1 readiness or TSA adequacy any less important. They play the crucial role of “keeping the lights on” and preserving value of the acquired business under new ownership.

If I look back at some of the most successful Carve-Outs I’ve worked on, they were those where Buyers were more intentional about the future state of the acquired business.

Day 1 was a starting point, not a destination.